Labor Related Executive Orders, Compliance Dates

Posted by admin on Monday Feb 16, 2009

Human Resources 4U

Your One Stop Human Resources Shop! 

Labor Related Executive Orders President Obama recently issued three Executive Orders (EO) that will have a significant impact on federal contractors and subcontractors. They also provide a glimpse into his views about organized labor.  In a prior blog I wrote about the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA). I think these Orders should be seen as a step moving closer to passage of the EFCA. You can review my article on the EFCA at my blog: www.humanresources4u.net 

The first EO is:

Economy in Government Contracting: Under this Executive Order, costs incurred by an employer to advise or persuade employees concerning the exercise of their labor rights are disallowed expenses for federal contractors, effective immediately. The second EO is:

Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers under Service Contracts: When a service contract expires and a subsequent Contractor is awarded the contract to perform the same service, the new Contractor was free to hire the predecessor’s employees, a new workforce, or a combination of both. Under this Executive Order, the subsequent employer must now offer the employees of the predecessor employer jobs for which they are qualified. The employer must hold the jobs open for at least 10 days. After that, the employer may hire new employees. This is a clear reversal of President Bush’s Executive Order 13201  The third EO is:

Notification of Employee Rights under Federal Labor Laws: This Executive Order requires federal Contractors and their subcontractors to post a notice advising employees of their rights under federal labor law. The language of the required posting notice is yet to be determined, but it is expected to include topics such as the right to organize, the right to engage in collective bargaining, and other rights under the National Labor Relations Act. A Contractor that violates the terms of the notice or any related rules issued by the Secretary of Labor is subject to termination of the contract and possible debarment from future government contracts. This is a clear reversal of President Bush’s Executive Order 13204. 

I-9 Update

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has delayed by 60 days, until April 3, 2009, the effective date for using the revised Form I-9, originally scheduled to go into effect today.  Please note:  Employers who use the new form prior to the April 3, 2009 effective date are subject to civil monetary penalties.   

Important Dates for HR compliance

  • February 1 is the date that your OSHA 300A log needs to be posted if you are subject to OSHA recordkeeping
  • February 2 is the date that you must start using the new I-9 forms
  • May 21 is the new date for Federal Contactors to start using E-Verify
  •  January 29 is the date the President signed the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
    • The Act will require employers to ensure that their pay practices are non-discriminatory and to make certain that they keep the records needed to prove the fairness of their pay decisions. There is a lot in this act and I will post a more detailed description of it in a later blog. 
  • Human Resources 4U is a full service Human Resources consulting company specializing in small and midsize businesses.  Note: This article is presented with the understanding that we are not engaged in rendering legal advice.  If legal advice is required, the services of a competent attorney should be sought. 

Tags : Uncategorized | add comments »

Layoff Considerations

Posted by admin on Monday Feb 16, 2009

Human Resources 4U         


Your One Stop Human Resources Shop!      

Layoff Considerations 

During these severe economic conditions many employers have to consider reductions in their workforce (RIF). However, when laid-off workers have a difficult time finding a new job, they are more inclined to sue their former employers.   Such suits may be more prevalent in the current economic downturn than in better times.  Deciding on a RIF is never easy for employers seeking to cut costs while minimizing their legal risks. If the RIF is not carefully planned in advance, a workforce reduction can result in considerable liability offsetting any initial savings the employer achieves.   Below you will find a brief overview of things to consider prior to conducting a RIF.

 WARN act

The first thing to consider is if the Federal or CA Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN) acts apply to you organization. The main criteria for the Federal act are:— 

  • If you employed 100 or more employees within the last 12 months— 
  • You must give a 60 day notice— 
  • For a plant closing (affects 50 or more employees)— 
  • Or a mass layoff (33% of employees) 

The main criteria for the CA act are:— 

  •  If you employed 75 or more employees within the last 12 months— 
  • You must give a 60 day notice— 
  • For a plant closing or mass layoff (affects 50 or more employees)

Employers who fail to provide required notices may be liable for back pay and the value of benefits lost during the violation period. 

Voluntary Programs

Prior to beginning a formal involuntary RIF you might want to consider the feasibility of voluntary attrition programs – some factors to consider are time constraints, business conditions, make-up of your workforce, and the availability of sufficient incentives for program participation.  You may be able to retain discretion to deny resignation requests from mission-critical employees under certain circumstances.    

Pension and Benefit Considerations

However, if you decide that you must go ahead with the RIF you will need to determine impact on any pension and benefit plans that you may offer –it may be prudent to avoid selecting employees for layoff shortly before they are scheduled to become vested in substantial employee benefits.   

Selection Criteria

Next you need to Prioritize your selection factors – If you are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement, you can use any criteria you want as long as you can show that you are not discriminating against a protected class. From an employer’s perspective you would want to base your decisions on performance criteria (keep your good performers and let your poor performers go). Your selection should always be based on quantifiable and objective factors, such as:

  • elimination of certain categories of employees, e.g., temporary, part-time, or contract workers
  • pre-existing job appraisal data related to successful performance of critical post-reduction functions
  • disciplinary actions taken for severe or persistent performance problems.
  • elimination of unnecessary job classifications
  • length of service or seniority

Disparate Impact Analysis

After you have made you initial layoff decisions you should also review for possible disparate impact prior to implementing layoffs.  You will need to see if there will be any disproportionate effect on protected categories, such as, minorities, women, or workers 40 years of age or older. If so, evaluate whether the selection of these individuals can be justified by business necessity, or in the case of older workers, by reasonable factors other than age.  If not, consider alternative selections of individuals who are outside the protected categories.  

A disparate impact analysis is a statistical calculation that may yield results that are not necessary apparent or intuitive but that the courts have used as a guideline in determining if a company is disproportionately laying off employees in protected EEO categories.   For example, let’s say you had 80 employees, with 15 of them over age 40 and you had to lay off 12 employees. A disparate impact analysis would indicate that if 3 or 4 of those layoffs were over 40, you would be OK. If 5 of the layoffs were over 40 you are in a “maybe OK” area but if 6 or more employees were over age 40 you would probably be in trouble. 

Obtaining a Release

A final option to consider would be to offer employees a severance agreement that would function as a general release. This can significantly reduce your legal exposure. There are several requirements for a release to be legal so it would be best if it were drafted or reviewed by an attorney. 

Separation Notices

Finally, there are various notices that must be provided to employees upon termination of employment. Employers are required to notify an employee of COBRA rights at the time of a qualifying event, including termination of employment. Similarly, employers must provide every employee with a notice regarding the availability of continued medical, surgical, or hospital benefits through the Department of Health Care Services’ Health Insurance Premium Program (HIPP). Employers must also provide to employees a pamphlet published by the California Employment Development Department (DE 2320). The pamphlet summarizes the employee’s rights to unemployment benefits. And lastly, employers need to provide to employees written notice regarding changes in their employment status. The notice must include, at a minimum, the name of the employer, the name of the employee, the social security number of the employee, whether the action is a termination or a layoff, and the date of the action.

If you are considering a RIF for your company and would like assistance to make sure you are doing it correctly, Human Resources 4U can help you with the process, as weel as, all your other Human Resource needs.

Human Resources 4U is a full service Human Resources consulting company specializing in small and midsize businesses.  Note: This article is presented with the understanding that we are not engaged in rendering legal advice.  If legal advice is required, the services of a competent attorney should be sought.

Tags : Uncategorized | 7 comments »